Our Blog
Federal Court Upholds Firearm Ban for Convicted Drug DealersPosted in 2nd Amendment on June 12, 2026
In U.S. v. Squire, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the law that prohibits people convicted of crimes “punishable by more than one year in prison” from possessing firearms. Squire argued that the law was unconstitutional because it inhibited his 2nd Amendment right to have a firearm… view more
PA Court Upholds ARD Denial After DUI Blood Test RefusalPosted in General on June 12, 2026
Pennsylvania’s Superior Court recently addressed whether a DUI defendant can be denied entry into the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) program after refusing a blood test in a Huntingdon County DUI case. In Commonwealth v. Falzone, the court held that denying ARD under these circumstances does not violate a defendant’s constitutional rights. Background of the Case… view more
PA Court Rules Flashlight Search of Shoebox Was UnconstitutionalPosted in Fourth Amendment on June 9, 2026
The Pennsylvania Superior Court, sitting en banc, recently issued a significant Fourth Amendment decision in Commonwealth v. Herlth that held that police violated constitutional protections against unreasonable searches when a state trooper shined a flashlight through a small manufacturer’s hole in a closed shoebox inside a man’s home during an overdose response. The ruling reinforces… view more
Conviction Overturned After DA and Judge Exchanged Texts During TrialPosted in Constitutional Rights on June 4, 2026
Improper & Unethical Ex Parte Communications The Pennsylvania Superior Court has granted a new trial to a Centre County defendant after finding that undisclosed text message communications between the trial judge and prosecutor during trial violated the defendant’s constitutional right to due process. In Commonwealth v. Brooks 1550 MDA 2024, the court reviewed allegations that… view more
PA DUI Conviction Reversed Over Improper Impairment TestimonyPosted in DUI on May 24, 2026
In Commonwealth v. Gause, the Pennsylvania Superior Court delivered a significant decision limiting the use of police opinion testimony in DUI–controlled substance prosecutions. The Court vacated the defendant’s conviction and discharged him entirely, finding both evidentiary error and insufficient evidence to sustain the charges. Factual Background The case arose from a late-night traffic stop for… view more
PA Supreme Court Allows Seizure of Firearm During Traffic StopPosted in Fourth Amendment,General on May 24, 2026
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s recent decision in Commonwealth v. Hawkins-Davenport provides important clarification on the scope of police authority during routine traffic stops—particularly when officers observe a firearm in plain view. Factual Background The case arose from a routine traffic stop in Philadelphia based on a vehicle equipment violation. During the stop, officers observed a… view more
PA Court Denies Rule 600 Speedy Trial DismissalPosted in Constitutional Rights on May 21, 2026
A recent Centre County Court decision highlights how Pennsylvania courts analyze Rule 600 speedy trial claims when a defendant cannot be located for an extended period of time. In this case, the court denied a defendant’s motion to dismiss felony drug deliver charges, finding that law enforcement exercised due diligence in attempting to locate and… view more
PA Court Reaffirms Strict Limits on Expungement of Conviction RecordsPosted in Expungement on April 9, 2026
The PA Superior Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Romeo, 2017 PA Super 1, underscores a critical—and often misunderstood—distinction in Pennsylvania expungement law: the sharp divide between arrest records and conviction records. The decision also affirms the long-standing precedent that expungements are only permitted when the law allows and not simply because a person really wants… view more
PA Court Upholds DUI Stop and Warrantless Blood DrawPosted in Constitutional Rights,DUI,Fourth Amendment on April 9, 2026
The Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Smith reinforces two critical principles in DUI litigation: (1) the relatively low threshold required for police to initiate a DUI stop, and (2) the continued viability of warrantless blood draws based on voluntary consent. Factual Background Smith was driving during the early morning hours in Mercer County… view more
PA DUI Conviction Based Upon Drinking GasolinePosted in DUI on March 22, 2026
In Commonwealth v. Roser, 914 A.2d 447 (Pa. Super. 2006), the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled on a challenge to the PA DUI law and whether it prohibited driving under the influence of gasoline. Factual Background Roser was stopped by police after he was observed driving over the center and fog lines and almost striking another… view more