Fourth Amendment

PA Court Rules Flashlight Search of Shoebox Was Unconstitutional

The Pennsylvania Superior Court, sitting en banc, recently issued a significant Fourth Amendment decision in Commonwealth v. Herlth that held that police violated constitutional protections against unreasonable searches when a state trooper shined a flashlight through a small manufacturer’s hole in a closed shoebox inside a man’s home during an overdose response. The ruling reinforces… view more

PA Supreme Court Allows Seizure of Firearm During Traffic Stop

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s recent decision in Commonwealth v. Hawkins-Davenport provides important clarification on the scope of police authority during routine traffic stops—particularly when officers observe a firearm in plain view. Factual Background The case arose from a routine traffic stop in Philadelphia based on a vehicle equipment violation. During the stop, officers observed a… view more

PA Court Upholds DUI Stop and Warrantless Blood Draw

The Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Smith reinforces two critical principles in DUI litigation: (1) the relatively low threshold required for police to initiate a DUI stop, and (2) the continued viability of warrantless blood draws based on voluntary consent. Factual Background Smith was driving during the early morning hours in Mercer County… view more

Centre County Judge Upholds Traffic Stop in Marijuana Case

The Court of Common Pleas of Centre County recently ruled in Commonwealth v. Klanish, CP-14-CR-922-2019, that evidence from a marijuana possession case would not be suppressed. This decision provides important guidance on Pennsylvania traffic stop laws, the authority of sheriff’s deputies, and when Miranda rights apply. Facts of the Case On April 30, 2019, a Centre… view more

PA Court Reverses Suppression of Drug Evidence

In Commonwealth v. Bentley, 1253 MDA 2024, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the Lycoming County trial court’s decision to suppress evidence in a drug trafficking case. The ruling strengthens law enforcement’s ability to obtain search warrants based on tips from confidential informants and reinforces how courts should apply the “probable cause” standard. Controlled Buy Leads… view more

PA Court Reverses Marijuana Convictions Over Unreliable Search Warrant

In a pivotal ruling for Pennsylvania criminal defense law, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed the drug convictions of two York County men—Charles and Timothy Manuel—after finding that the search warrant used to enter their home lacked sufficient probable cause. This en banc decision underscores the importance of police corroboration when relying on tips from… view more

Judge Rules “Hot Pursuit” Justified DUI Stop Outside Jurisdiction

In Commonwealth v. Lee, CP-14-CR-1136-2024, the Centre County Court of Common Pleas ruled that a Bellefonte police officer lawfully stopped a suspected drunk driver outside of her jurisdiction under Pennsylvania’s Municipal Police Jurisdiction Act (MPJA). This case provides important guidance for anyone facing DUI charges in Pennsylvania, especially when questions arise about whether officers acted… view more

PA Court Suppresses Evidence from Warrantless Protective Sweep

In Commonwealth v. Hightower, 2025 PA Super 129, the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a York County judge’s suppression of evidence in a felony drug and firearm case. The ruling provides a critical reminder of the constitutional limits on police conduct during protective sweeps and the plain view doctrine. Background of the Case In the case,… view more

Judge Suppresses Evidence in State College Marijuana Case

A Centre County judge ruled that a vehicle stop and subsequent search of a vehicle were unconstitutional, resulting in the suppression of nearly an ounce of marijuana and related paraphernalia. The case, Commonwealth v. Max Jean,  serves as a critical reminder of the legal protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, particularly when police rely on odor-based… view more